All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the expressed written permission of the American Geosciences Institute is expressly prohibited.
Click here for all copyright requests. Skip to main content. Enter your search terms.
- Neighborhood Distribution Program.
- Apparently Gang Related?
- Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Network Analysis (Wiley Series in Computational Statistics)!
- Understanding Jan-San Redistribution - convention - headssucaconna.ml.
- First Person - is it a game or reality?.
Benchmarks: January 3—5, 18, landslides wreak havoc on the San Francisco Bay area. The region had historically endured heavy rains during the winter months, with individual storms sometimes bringing more than half the annual average rainfall in a single hour span. But a collection of unique factors in created a recipe for a landslide disaster.
Wholesalers Help You Profit
First, two weather fronts merged, bringing copious amounts of rain to an already saturated region. Second, the rising population had resulted in a construction boom in the iconic hills of the Bay Area. Their experiment, on the other hand, used a modified dictator game. This is a classic economics experiment where each participant is asked to divide a pot of money between themselves and another anonymous person.
This experiment is generally interpreted as a way to measure selfishness and generosity. By asking people to do this 50 times for many different values of x, they can classify participants as more concerned about equity or efficiency.direscive.ml
Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials | Chemical Reviews
These results might be different because our question directly asked people about their preferences regarding government intervention to improve equity, while the experiment in the Science article tested whether individuals wanted to improve equity through private redistribution, from one citizen to another. Essentially, the authors looked at different forms of redistribution.
One possible explanation for the difference in the results is that people may have different preferences for how redistribution takes place. Some may prefer to have income inequality addressed through government intervention rather than through private giving.
Supply Chain, Logistics and Distribution Network Design Modelling
This is especially true if you think that the government is better at targeting fund recipients than any given individual. An alternative explanation is that our question asked people to state their preferences, while the experiment in the Science article involved real money.
Participants in that experiment were not making hypothetical choices; they actually did divide money between themselves and others. Talk is cheap.
It's easy to say you want the government to redistribute income, but that doesn't mean you'll actually support it when the time comes. However, one could also argue that the dictator game, while it involves real money, is far from a normal situation. In some sense the dictator game is like that — players receive money and are asked if they want to share it with a stranger. How people behave in this situation might not be perfectly related to how they feel about redistribution or income inequality.
In contrast to the Science article, which suggests that redistribution doesn't occur because elites don't really want it, we find that elites and especially Democratic elites do have a strong preference for redistribution.
Original Research ARTICLE
We think more investigation is needed to understand why new redistribution initiatives are difficult to enact. One possibility is that those with the lowest levels of income, who would benefit from redistribution, are less likely to vote or otherwise participate in the political process. Another is that divisiveness on the issue is preventing backers of redistribution measures from gaining traction. Michael S.